Saucony Shadow 6000 Suede
But changing the source of funds fails to get to the roots of the real problems that confront government firefighting agencies every year:
So it's important, at least in the short run, that the agencies stop robbing the fire protection funds to pay firefighting costs. For the long run, we need to do a better job of managing our lands.
1. Are we fighting the right fires in the right ways?
"Wildfires are being allowed to become disasters," Sen. Risch said at a news conference this week, "and they should be funded through the disaster fund. If we more effectively manage our lands, fewer fires will become disasters."
That's not good news for the government's Saucony Tan
Nor is it easy to justify spending scarce resources on the overwhelming challenge of preventing fires by thinning overgrown forests, clearing underbrush and removing fire prone trees that have been attacked by various pests.
hopes to prevent fires in the first place. As long as too little money is budgeted for fighting fires and the additional money is taken out of fire prevention programs, costs will continue to climb.
coming out of fire restoration and prevention programs.
Stop robbing prevention to pay for fighting fires
Even with the political fractures in Congress that have made legislating difficult, lawmakers are capable of getting behind a bipartisan plan like the one proposed by the four Reebok Lifters 2017
senators for finding the funds for fighting fires. They are ill equipped, however, to discuss the big picture. The political bias is to fight fires when they occur. Letting a fire burn naturally, especially those that aren't human caused, is not easy.
That makes more sense than taking the money from prevention programs, although the large number of major disasters in the past few years hurricanes and floods in the East, in particular, Saucony Shadow 6000 Suede but this year's unusual weather patterns are likely to produce flooding in the Midwest and elsewhere in the coming months have put considerable pressure on the disaster funds, too.
In fact, government firefighting efforts have gone over budget in eight of the past 10 years, with most of the additional money Reebok Gold Lifters
The senators' plan (a companion bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives) would require that when firefighting costs reach 70 percent of the 10 year average, the agencies that fight fires could dip into the government's fund for other natural disasters such as hurricanes.
And we know that the failure to take precautionary measures has made the situation worse. Fires are burning hotter because of the large amounts of fuel available, much of it dead and dying.
Yet, we know that those programs work.
That's why a plan proposed by Republican Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch of Idaho, with Democratic Sens. Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley of Oregon to change the source of extra funds needed for fighting fires is particularly welcome this year. It should get quick consideration by Congress before the fire season begins.
And, given the drought that has plagued most of the West in the past year and fire conditions that are being described as dire, the odds are that it's going to take even more money this summer to fight wildfires.
2. Are we doing the right things to prevent wildfires in the first place?
Saucony Shadow 6000 Suede
Saucony New York